Of course, this is true in the traditional sense, for published periodicals. In the world of food, among others, there’s Canal House Cooking, Remedy Quarterly, and the latest darling, Lucky Peach. I’ll admit that my relationship with this new rag from McSweeny’s and David Chang has been volatile, but I believe its publishing calendar played an important role in allowing me to transition from my initial, unfavorable take, to my current position of admiration.
When I first picked up Lucky Peach, I was wooed by the graphic design and investment in original illustration, but I was acutely turned off by the voice and the unnecessarily long (16 page!) and tiresome blow-by-blow of the research process. In short, I found it to be an aggressive, overly masculine, masturbatory work of drivel whose potential target audience was little more than the authors and their best friends. But I tabled it for a few weeks, and then slipped it in my bag on my way out the door to a summer getaway. I proceeded to read every article, word for word. This almost never happens. Despite the article that initially turned me off (whose format has unfortunately been repeated in the second issue), I went on to find seemingly endless unexpected treasures, like recipes for ramen and slow cooked eggs. I now find Lucky Peach to be a unique peek into “modernist cuisine” that fills a huge gap in the food magazine landscape and provides access to a culinary world that has previously been all but inaccessible to us food layfolk. If issues had been gathering on my coffee table, I wouldn’t have had the time to reassess.